![]() Ease of installation, configuration, management.Not sure, but I don't think any of them have WG or OpenVPN inbuilt. MacOS, Windows, and iOS all have ipsec support built in. Installing and managing said drivers can be a PITA. I believe these are all x86/圆4 based, which will of course have better performance than the Pi.īoth of these studies rate WG #1, ipsec #2, and OpenVPN #3 on performance.īut, in addition to performance, there are (at least) a couple of things to consider when building a VPN: ![]() Here are two performance studies that I found last time I looked at this: and. Should I not buy an ethernet HAT on the server too to increase speed? (traffic going out and in). I planned to buy an ethernet HAT on the client so the original ETH > WAN and the HAT forward the traffic to the client. ![]() I'm still unsure do I just do a simple VPN server or setup site to site, in this config I'll might be able to only use pi_server and connect to it with my UDM_PRO (Unifi) The idea is to connect the pi_server in country A, pi_client in country B so the iMac connected to the pi_client in country B are seen as they were in country A. Any thought on the faster VPN server option for a Raspberry PI between WireGuard, opnsense and openwrt and PiVPN? ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |